This blog is hosted on Ideas on EuropeIdeas on Europe Avatar


How Brexit Reveals the Inherent Flaws of Devolution

Devolution 1While the debate on Brexit remains heated, with all eyes fixed on the ongoing negotiation process and its consequences for both the EU and the UK, it is important to remind oneself that the United Kingdom does not only consist of the four ‘home nations’, but also of a variety of regions. In other words: Brexit has interconnected aspects that, although apparently less controversial, have significant impact on the daily life of people.

An excellent seminar on this regional perspective was organised by Professor Ignazio Cabras at Northumbria University last July. It brought together academics, business representatives, trade unions and local authorities and provided an excellent forum to exchange ideas on The Implications of Brexit for the Future of Devolution in the North East of England and for the Northern Powerhouse, as the event’s title had it.

The seminar was opened by Professor Keith Shaw with a key-question that dominated the discussion during the entire day: where will the powers repatriated by Brexit actually end up?

The relatively young process of devolution of power in Britain has been, for historical reasons, an asymmetric one. Today we observe a sort of race among the regions with the objective to obtain more competences and control from London. A flurry of local entities at different levels (municipalities, regions and intermediate authorities) negotiate devolution deals with the central government not only to get funds, but also to obtain the necessary powers to use them and to implement local policies. The results of these negotiations may vary depending on numerous factors. The territorial entities that can count on more experienced negotiators, for example, are likely to achieve better concessions. Among others, the capacity building at the local level is a key-issue For administrators involved in the negotiations and for those exercising new competences.

Northumbria 1

Discussing the implications of Brexit for the North East.

The UK is considered, as a whole, a net contributor to the EU budget. There are, however, some areas like the North East of England who are net beneficiaries. Hence, the disappearance of financial resources redistributed by the EU as a consequence of Brexit will create a budget problem. In addition, this region is a strong exporter to the EU’s internal single market and, given its own demographic limits, its industrial sector needs to attract workers. Thus, the risk of economic downturn is taken into account by both the business representatives and the local authorities.

This whole situation triggers a fierce competition among local entities to get the best possible deal with the government. However, like in all races, where there are winners there are of course also losers. Brexit is revealing a highly fragmented society and the pressure it puts on the devolution process is likely to constitute an additional factor of division: the transfer of financial resources and competences from the centre to the periphery is not homogeneous. It depends on how local needs are determined, and it is almost inevitably a producer of perceived injustice.

The North East needs a new budget angel.

The North East needs a new budget angel.

Further concerns were raised during the seminar. On the one hand, the business representatives are worried about the negative economic impact of an exclusion from the EU’s internal market. On the other hand, the trade unions are afraid that, at the end of the day, the weaker social classes will be the ones that will finally pay the cost of the Brexit. They have good reasons to be concerned: with the ‘European Union (Withdrawal) Bill 2017-19’ (also called ‘Great Repeal Bill’), the UK intends to transpose the directly applicable EU Law into domestic law; after that, the rules will be changed on a case-by-case basis not only by the Parliament, but also by the Government through the delegated powers. There is no guaranty that the common standards of the EU, for example in terms of consumer rights and labour rights, which are higher compared to other areas of the world and strongly protected by the Court of Justice of the EU, will remain untouched.

The devolution process is considered necessary in the UK because the country’s economic growth and productivity is uneven. However, if the way in which it is pursued is as unbalanced as it appears today, rather than mitigating the fragmentation of society, there is a risk of aggravating the differences between urban and rural areas and the wealth gap between social classes.


Recent Articles

Change of mood on the Euro. Even at EUSA 2017!

Published on by | Comments Off

Early this month I had the fortune to attend the biannual conference of the European Studies Association (EUSA) in Miami. As always, and as it could not be otherwise, I attended as many panels on the European Monetary Union as I could. I also discussed the future of the Euro with a number of colleagues […]

Economics as a social science

Published on by | Comments Off

Has there been, since the outbreak of the economic and financial crisis in 2008, one single op-ed piece in major international newspapers that did not, in one way or another, refer to Keynes, Keynesian theory and recipes, or Keynesianism as a kind of handbook or roadmap for political leaders dealing with failing banks, sluggish growth, […]

Northern Ireland: A Casualty of Brexit?

Published on by | Comments Off
Hard border

As if things were not already complicated enough in Northern Ireland, recent events have even added to the general feeling of instability and uncertainty. Both the assembly elections and the unfolding of Brexit – with increasing disagreements between London and Edinburgh – have not been particularly encouraging. The Assembly elections The 2017 Northern Ireland Assembly […]

What makes the Dutch Dutch? A constitutional perspective.

Published on by | Comments Off
The hilarious 'Netherlands Second!' clip (click on the picture). Is self-mocking irony typically Dutch?

Ever since the rise of the Christian Democrats (CDA) in the beginning of the 2000′s, the issue of ‘Normen en Waarden’ has been a topic in the elections. Jan Peter Balkenende was the first to frame the problems in Dutch society as the result of individualistic attitudes propagated by the preceding cabinets. As with a lot of […]

Whatever happened to the Dutch Left?

Published on by | Comments Off

Third post in our series on the Dutch general elections. Questions on the vital statistics of ‘The Left’ are rising everywhere in the Western World. At least in the Netherlands, it is too early to organise a wake. We may be well known for our liberal and permissive attitude to society (which is not the […]

Can the populist far-right win the elections in the Netherlands?

Published on by | Comments Off
Good colleagues in the EP.

Second post on our series on the Dutch general elections. On Wednesday 15 March, Dutch voters will head to the polls to elect a new parliament and prime minister. And for once, the rest of Europe is very interested, as the question looms whether the leader of the far-right populist Party for Freedom (PVV) Geert […]

Dutch coalition politics and the 2017 general elections

Published on by | Comments Off

The year 2017 is widely seen as hugely important for European politics, with general elections in key European Union member states Germany and the Netherlands – and perhaps even in Italy – and presidential elections in France. Following the United Kingdom’s Brexit vote and the election of President Donald Trump in the United States, populist […]

Europessimism’s finest clothes

Published on by | Comments Off
Illusion cover

Taking Tony Judt’s A Grand Illusion? out of the shelf again. Revisiting a book on the general state and mid-term prospects of the European Union that was only written twenty years ago may turn out to be a very useful exercise. It puts into perspective the achievements and failures of what is a slow and […]

Take-aways on federation and sovereignty

Published on by | Comments Off
Julien Barroche and Olivier Beaud, welcomed by Arnauld Leclerc from the Chair of European Philosophy.

Ask not whether the European Union is a federation or not, ask what Europe can teach us about the very concept of federation! In a nutshell, this is one of my major take-homes from a particularly enriching seminar held in Nantes on 17 February at the Chair of European Philosophy of Alliance Europa. Olivier Beaud, […]

Semester grades for Theresa May

Published on by | Comments Off
Transcript of records (final)

To whom it may concern This is to certify that Ms Theresa May successfully passed the admission exam of the ‘Higher Management and Governance’ executive education programme, generally known as ‘HMG’, in July 2013. At the end of her first semester, during which her performance was evaluated through continuous assessment, she has now submitted her […]

UACES and Ideas on Europe do not take responsibility for opinions expressed in articles on blogs hosted on Ideas on Europe. All opinions are those of the contributing authors.