This blog is hosted on Ideas on EuropeIdeas on Europe Avatar

Catalonia: Headlong into the unknown.

DiadaCome October, something with high political voltage will happen in Catalonia and, therefore, in Spain. The main question is that nobody knows exactly what will be. The Catalan Government is strongly committed to holding a referendum on Catalan independence, while the Spanish central government is just as strongly committed to preventing anyone from taking part in it. As a result, uncertainty is at its maximum.

On 6 September, the Catalan regional parliament passed a piece of legislation calling for the forthcoming Catalan-wide referendum on 1st October. This had been its political commitment since its election in 2015. The problem with this legislation is that, in order to be fully operative, it must break the current Spanish Constitution (and even the current Catalan regional constitution!). The legislation was approved after midnight, while the opposition left the parliament in a sign of protest and civil servants refused to stamp their signature on it. The Catalan independentist parties hold the majority of seats, but they represent less than 50% of voters. The opposition parties – Ciudadanos/ALDE, the Popular Party (PPE), Catalan Socialist Party (S&D) – fought against the approval while the leftists from CSQP/GUE-NGL were also critical but with a high level of internal division on the issue.

Since that night, all the Spanish institutions have worked hard in order to avoid the referendum: the Constitutional Court decided to suspend the referendum legislation; the General Attorney announced new complaints for everyone who co-operates with the referendum; the central Government announced to freeze the bank accounts of the Catalan Government; and different police corps (national, regional and even local) were asked to pursue any initiative in favour of the referendum, including the capture and seizure of any propaganda. As a last resource, Spanish Government can trigger article 155 of the Constitution which allows it to suspend the Catalan autonomous government. This would be a kind of constitutional ‘nuclear bomb’ with unforeseeable consequences.

While this offensive is carried out, the Catalan government continues with the idea of holding the consultation, asking local authorities to support the initiative by providing local institutions to become electoral stations. By this moment, around 700 out of 900 local authorities have joined the referendum. For the Catalan independentist government, the reasoning is simple: the Spanish Constitution and the Regional Constitution do not rule in Catalonia anymore. Instead, there is the law of the referendum and an approved law of transition, both of them being suspended by the Spanish Constitutional Court. The Catalan government is claiming that their aspirations are grounded in international law, but no international organization has openly supported them.

In the middle of this political mess, civil society is breaking in two: everybody is asking for democracy, but democracy means different things to citizens. For one half, democracy means the right to decide the future of its country. For the other one, democracy means to respect the rule of law.

TaureauxSocial polarization is deepening. Despite the fact that Catalan society is almost equally divided into two halves, with a little advantage for non-secessionist positions, non-nationalist Catalan citizens feel the Catalan government does not care about them. At the same time, the political mobilization of secessionist groups is much higher, occupying more space in the public debate. Fortunately, until now, no violence has appeared in the streets. In the rest of Spain, the parties of the left are looking with suspicion on the efforts of the Central Government to repress the referendum, criticizing the way in which Mariano Rajoy decided to tackle this challenge.

The reasons for this situation are both historical and cyclical. Catalonia was used to having a special self-government status from the Middle Ages until the XVIII Century, when a new royal dynasty – the Bourbons – decided to put an end to it. In the Second Republic, between 1931 and 1936, Catalonia partially recovered its self-government, but over the following decades, Franco’s regime treated it with a high level of repression. During the democratic transition in the 1970s, a new status of autonomy was granted, but the old level of self-government never came back. Only in 2006, a new regional constitution recovered a higher amount of autonomy, but the Popular Party asked the Constitutional Court to review it. The result was a new cut in self-government in 2010, which triggered a high level of despair and disappointment within a majority of the Catalan society.

Besides these historical reasons, cyclical reasons count as well. The recent economic and institutional crisis has eroded the political compromise between the Catalans and the rest of the Spanish people. Independentist tendencies have grown during the economic crisis, although most of the independentist voters are located in the middle and upper classes. They claim that Catalonia is not receiving enough funding to develop their self-government, while they pay much more taxes than other regions. Nationalist calculations pretend that this deficit is around 16 billion euros per year, while non-nationalist economists talk about a much lower figure, around 2 billion.

Although much needed, dialogue seems to be unlikely at this stage. Like in the chicken game, where two cars are approaching in the same road, each one expects the other to withdraw from the pavement, dreaming to achieve a great political success. But after years of strong public declarations concerning the right to self-determination by one side and the unity of Spain and rule of law by the other side, stepping down now might be seen as a signal of weakness. Last opportunities to find an arrangement that would have been acceptable for everyone were wasted between 2006 and 2012. As things look now, it’s not the time for being too optimistic.

One Response to Catalonia: Headlong into the unknown.

  1. avatar Rachid ELAÏDI says:

    ”…Pour moitié, la démocratie signifie le droit de décider de l’avenir de son pays. Pour l’autre, la démocratie signifie respecter la règle de droit. ” oui en effet ,un État de droit est d’abord le respect du droit et en particulier le droit constitutionnel. Il y va donc de soi le droit doit être large et ne contiendrait aucune restriction ou un non dit. Je prend pour exemple, le traité européen de Lisbonne, il fait mention qu’un pays de l’union européenne peut empreinter l”’exit” ainsi ,la Grande Bretagne , avec son referendum sur la base du traité de Lisbonne a pu entamer son BREXIT qui aurait été impossible si l’article 50 n’y figure pas ! Donc pour être juste ici à la Catalogne ,il faut que la constitution espagnole mentionne un article permettant l’indépendance de toutes les régions d’Espagne comme en Irak avec les kurdes qui ont besoin donc de reformer la constitution pour pouvoir accéder à une indépendance ,qui veut dire le respect de l’État de droit . Maintenant ,rien n’empêche à la région d’organiser un referendum, qui sera consultatif et n’a aucune valeur en droit international .

    L’utilisation de l’ article 155 de la Constitution est un non sens ,si on considère l’Espagne comme un État de droit . Donc ,à Madrid de supprimer d’abord cet article et ensuite de réformer la constitution espagnole et de fond en comble ,dit autrement de dépoussiérer la constitution et l’adapter au XXI ème siècle. Car, il faut savoir les peuples qui habitent les régions sont de plus en plus demandeurs d’une indépendance car le pouvoir central a des prérogatives qui ne peut satisfaire toutes les régions à la fois et les séparatistes commencent toujours par imposer leur dialecte comme langue officiel et peu à peu exigent une indépendance dont le moteur peut être le pétrole comme chez les kurdes en Irak ou le phosphate au Sahara dit occidental , ou tout simplement de s’occuper des investissements dans leur région par exemple le Rif marocain…

    En tout état de cause, la réforme de la constitution du gouvernement central est la condition sine-qua-non pour qu’un État puisse être considéré comme un État de droit . Et donc par voie de conséquence, il faut un débat parlementaire pour un affrontement direct ,entre députés( les pour et les contres) pour réformer la constitution et ensuite la porte est ouverte à tous les referendums car la souveraineté est celle du peuple qui veut une séparation comme au sud de Soudan ou la Tchécoslovaquie(en Tchéquie et Slovaquie) …ou d’autres qui veulent se fusionner ou encore ceux qui se sont séparés autrefois et, demandent aujourd’hui de se fusionner…Et éventuellement, il y a des conditions d’ordre international pour se faire valoir une séparation ou une fusion . Mais la constitution doit contenir un article permettant l’indépendance des régions par referendum et ce sont les politiques qui doivent se débattre avec force et détermination pour ou contre le referendum. Et il va se soi , le gouvernement central ne doit pas négliger les régions dans ses infrastructures, son budget ,…donc pas de négligence . Si le gouvernement central d’Irak avait exploité les richesses pétrolières des kurdes et au profil de tous les citoyens irakiens sans oublier les kurdes , les choses publiques seront autrement … La Catalogne veut toujours son indépendance et donc il faut une réforme de la constitution espagnole et donc una approbation du Cortès à Madrid et non du parlement local…

UACES and Ideas on Europe do not take responsibility for opinions expressed in articles on blogs hosted on Ideas on Europe. All opinions are those of the contributing authors.